Skip to content
The Formula 1 Grand Prix race is due to go ahead in Bahrain on 22 April 2012
Bahrain Grand Prix
Update by news editor   20-04-2012

Formula 1 furore

Riots in Bahrain ahead of Sunday's Grand Prix

Fury is growing among protesters, politicians and human rights groups over Formula 1's plans to go ahead with its Grand Prix race in Bahrain on Sunday.

Extra protection for drivers and spectators is being organised as protesters there have promised "three days of rage".

A car carrying Formula 1 staff had to swerve to avoid a pertrol bomb that was thrown at it during a riot outside the race track yesterday.

Just over a year ago, the leaders of Bahrain started a brutal crackdown against anti-government protesters.

The demonstrators have been calling for proper human rights and more democracy. Their protests have been mainly peaceful, though a small number of them have been becoming more violent and extreme.

Bahrain is ruled by a king - Sheikh Hamad bin Issa Al Khalifa. His clan has been in charge of the island for more than two hundred years.

The king and his family are Sunni Muslims, but the majority of the people of Bahrain are Shia Muslims. Many Shias say they are treated unfairly in the country.

Violence, torture and unfair trials are often used against people who speak out against the rulers.

Protesters say the Formula 1 race should not go ahead because it allows the Bahrain government to pretend that everything is fine.

One activist said: "People here are getting killed, and with F1 here we feel like they are driving on our blood, on our bodies."

The president of Formula 1 Jean Todt said his organisation was "only interested in sport not politics".

 

Click here to have a go at our Bahrain Grand Prix protest quiz.

Lesson ideas and suggestions

Read and discuss lesson ideas on our Facebook page

Join our mailing list (Glow login required)

Formula 1 furore

Bahrain on course for a political collision course

It's business as usual in Bahrain, or at least that's what the country's government would like the world to think.

This week, as thousands of tourists flood in to Bahrain for the controversial Bahrain Formula 1 Grand Prix, there is a revving up of political protest that could well drown out the sound of the engines on the starting grid for Sunday's race.

It was just over a year ago that Bahrain's authorities launched their brutal crackdown on anti-Government protesters as the first rumblings of an uprising were felt.

Since then, King Hamad and the Sunni al Khalifa clan that has ruled this island for more than two centuries have promised political reform. The reality, however, is very different.

This Sunday's sporting spectacle is just an opportunity for a regime more concerned with improving its image than delivering political reform, proper human rights or any solution to the deep-rooted sense of discrimination felt by the country's Shia majority.

Bahrain is certainly not a stable and legitimate democracy. Instead, almost daily, its police and legal system use excessive force, widespread torture, unfair trials and unlawful killings in crushing those outspoken enough to question the state.

Evidence of this has been gathered by human rights monitors including Amnesty International, which published its own detailed findings earlier this week.

Perhaps equally worrying are signs of a drift towards violence among protestors as some individuals, frustrated with the lack of change, begin to use ever more drastic measures to achieve their goals.

Fortunately, so far, these radicalised individuals remain a minority and their dangerous tactics are roundly condemned by most opposition activists who rely on legitimate street protests to make their case and grievances heard.

The danger though is that the activities of these militants will only toughen the crackdown imposed by the Bahraini Government.

A petrol bomb was hurled at a car carrying Formula 1 staff yesterday in protest at the sport's decision to go ahead with its Grand Prix on Sunday.

And two weeks ago an improvised explosive device detonated near a police checkpoint at the entrance of the Shi'ite village of Akr in Bahrain, injuring seven policemen.

For now it's Bahrain's precious Grand Prix the government seems to prioritise in efforts to improve its image in the eyes of the international community.

The time has come for it to rethink those priorities. Until it does so, Bahrain will remain locked on a political collision course with dangerous consequences.

 

Click here to have a go at our Bahrain Grand Prix protest quiz.

Lesson ideas and suggestions

Read and discuss lesson ideas on our Facebook page

Join our mailing list (Glow login required)

adapted from article by David Pratt
read original story here

Experiences & Outcomes

  • I can use evidence selectively to research current social, political or economic issues. SOC 2-15a
  • I can use my knowledge of current social, political or economic issues to interpret evidence and present an informed view. SOC 3-15a
  • I can evaluate conflicting sources of evidence to sustain a line of argu ment. SOC 4-15a
  • I can gather and use information about forms of discrimination against people in societies and consider the impact this has on people’s lives. SOC 2-16b
  • I can explain why a group I have identified might experience inequality and can suggest ways in which this inequality might be addressed. SOC 3-16a
  • I can describe the main features of a democracy and discuss the rights and responsibilities of citizens in Scotland. SOC 2-17a
  • I have compared the rights and responsibilities of citizens in Scotland with a contrasting society and can describe and begin to understand reasons for differences. SOC 3-17a
  • I can critically analyse the relative importance of the contribution of individuals or groups in bringing about change in a significant political event. SOC 4-17a
  • I can contribute to a discussion on the actions and motives of a group or organisation which seeks to achieve its aims by non-democratic means. SOC 4-18c
  • Having considered responses to a recent international crisis, I can contribute to a discussion of the effectiveness of the responses. SOC 3-19b
  • By examining the role and actions of selected international organisations, I can evaluate how effective they are in meeting their aims. SOC 4-19b