Skip to content
Aid has reached east Africa but we need to be quicker next time, charities say. Pic: Andy Hall/Oxfam
Kenyan villagers at a water collection point
Update by news editor   19-01-2012

East Africa: delay was deadly

Quicker response to drought could have saved thousands of lives

Thousands of people could have been saved from starving to death in east Africa last year if the rest of the world had reacted more quickly.

That's what two major charities, Oxfam and Save the Children, have said.

Between 50,000 and 100,000 people died between April and August 2011 after severe drought hit parts of Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia and Djibouti. More than half of the victims were children under the age of five.

Aid organisations knew that a major emergency was on its way months before people started to die from hunger. But they didn't have enough money to do anything about it until it was too late and the disaster had already struck.

Governments, aid organisations and members of the public need to be ready to react more quickly to make sure a crisis like last year's never happens again, the charities say.

"We can no longer allow this grotesque situation to continue; where the world knows an emergency is coming but ignores it until confronted with TV pictures of desperately malnourished children." said Justin Forsyth, the boss of Save the Children.

"The warning signs were clear and with more money when it really mattered, the suffering of thousands of children would have been avoided."

The criticism comes as another food crisis is looming in west Africa, putting millions of people at risk. Save the Children say that families in the worst hit areas of Niger are already struggling with around one third less food, money and fuel than is necessary to survive.

 

Click here to test your knowledge in our daily quiz.

Lesson ideas and suggestions

Read and discuss lesson ideas on our Facebook page

Join our mailing list (Glow login required)

East Africa: delay was deadly

We need to talk about the F-word.

Yes, famine. A  report out yesterday from two of the UK's biggest aid agencies admitted their part in the bungled response to the 2011 east African famine in which between 50,000 and 100,000 people died needlessly.

"We all bear responsibility for the dangerous delay that cost lives," confesses Judith Robertson, head of Oxfam Scotland.

Here's the rub. The long rains never came in northern Kenya or southern Ethiopia and Somalia in autumn 2010. By the time the short rains of March 2011 also failed, satellite imagery and distress calls from aid staff on the ground made it clear that trouble loomed.

But the agencies hesitated and so did the Kenyan and Ethiopian governments. (Somalia doesn't really have one, which was part of the problem.) Nobody wanted to call it a crisis, let alone use the F-word, in case the rains arrived late, the crisis dissipated and they ended up being accused of crying wolf.

The UN, the African Union, the EU and the US all continued to describe the famine as a drought until 18 July. Yet by that time up to 80,000 had died of starvation and dehydration. A technical definition of famine that leaves the outside world oblivious to the emerging calamity is profoundly unhelpful.

Now famine threatens large parts of west Africa and unless local, national and international communities can learn the lesson of last year, the same will happen there. The lesson is that aid agencies need to shout louder earlier and we need to respond accordingly.

The Scottish public did contribute to the £8.8m raised by the Disasters Emergency Committee, as well as £336,345 from the Celtic-Manchester United Legends match and £100,000 from the Scottish Government. But though all this undoubtedly saved lives, it arrived too late to save many others, predominantly women and small children.

It isn't about money. It's about how it's spent. It's about spending a few quid keeping a herder's goats alive, rather than six times more helping him restock. It's about Oxfam spending £600,000 to rehabilitate water schemes in Ethiopia, so it doesn't have to spend more than £2m trucking in enough water to keep 80,000 thirsty people alive. It's about building resilience. It's about shifting the balance from emergency response to long-term development.

We don't wait for a car crash before considering how to pay for repairs. We take out insurance. That's how we should approach international aid. Do we have to ask the mothers of Mali and Niger to wait until their children are walking skeletons before we help them? We have the knowledge. We have the means. All we lack is the will.

 

Click here to test your knowledge in our daily quiz.

Lesson ideas and suggestions

Read and discuss lesson ideas on our Facebook page

Join our mailing list (Glow login required)

adapted from article by Anne Johnstone
read original story here

Experiences & Outcomes

  • I can use evidence selectively to research current social, political or economic issues. SOC 2-15a
  • I can use my knowledge of current social, political or economic issues to interpret evidence and present an informed view. SOC3-15a
  • I can evaluate conflicting sources of evidence to sustain a line of argument. SOC 4-15a
  • Having considered responses to a recent international crisis, I can contribute to a discussion of the effectiveness of the responses. SOC 3-19b
  • By examining the role and actions of selected international organisations, I can evaluate how effective they are in meeting their aims. SOC 4-19b